top of page


  • Chris Bratton - Tech Journalist

The biggest tech IPOs had ‘No Regret’ on bad decision making

For the last few years, businesses and organisations have followed a different strategy to stay afloat. Of course, the wave of technology is only getting updated each year, but we were not ready for a deadly pandemic.

It affected systems worldwide; some collapsed, some shrank, and some grew tenfold. The biggest tech IPO of the year had their downfalls due to bad decision-making, but it worked out pretty well in the end.

New Constructs, a research firm that started information in July 2002, talked about various mistakes made by tech IPO’s and still, they made massive revenue at the end year chart. Of course, there are tons of decisions behind the one customer see; some are bad calls. They make using the service more complex than it already is.

Instead of leaving those services, customers tend to adapt to the updates and benefit eventually. Tech companies and even large one in Silicon Valley sometimes follows the same process.

New Constructs compiled some of its best results to date and published some pessimistic calls on some of the hottest IPOs. One of which is electric vehicle maker Rivian. According to the last check, the IPO was worth $13 billion, one-fifth of the total market evaluation. David Trainer, CEO of New Constructs, said he felt suitable for putting something out there that ‘makes a lot of mathematical sense.’

Sweetgreen Inc., a restaurant company famous for its fast operation and casual serving healthy foods, also listed its IPO. New Constructs came with a price target of $0, but the offer price was $28.

Electric vehicles are receiving tons of attention lately as Tesla became so successful, their company evaluation reached trillions of dollars. Rivian, another electric vehicle company, though not as vast as Tesla. With a market evaluation of $66.5 billion before the IPO, its evaluation was one-third of the company net worth, which was taken with a grain of salt by the research firm.

In October, GitLab, Microsoft’s GitHub’s biggest competitor, was valued as low as $770 million. It was 93 per cent lower than usual share prices. GitLab is a software sharing platform for companies and developers where it is possible to push direct updates to software, distribute, modify and do similar tasks. GitLab saw tons of success at the start of 2021 and went beyond GitHub price point. Later it drowned far below the bear market.

Founder and CEO of New Constructs, David Trainer, said his company does footnote analysis that drives truly un-conflicted and comprehensive ‘fundamental research’ into ‘quality-of-earnings’ and ‘valuation.’

He felt confident in putting out ideas to the market. In an interview, he regularly talked about the crazy stuff happening on the market. ‘I can’t let that bother me. I have to stay true to what I think is right.’

According to Trainer, these IPO valuations are not correct or close to what it is. The gimmick must stay in the shadows to not shake up the stakeholder mindset. As stakeholders are the key to primary funding, the company may suffer unavoidable loss if anything happens to it.

New Constructs independent investment research tactics bring in the quality of earnings, forensic accounting and discounted cash flow valuation in the market. These data are from public companies. The research conducted was taken from ratings of over 3,000 company stocks and 7,000 mutual funds. Even 400 EFTs were included to gather analytical data.

The IPO coverage works on competition as Trainers had hundreds of customers dived into investments. TD Ameritrade and Interactive Brokers are some of the company partners.

IPO data includes a $1.2 trillion valuation of Tesla, 171 per cent asset evaluation of Uber and similar large scale companies.


bottom of page