top of page


  • Philip Osadebay - Tech Journalist

WhatsApp, Signal and other encryption messaging apps join forces to oppose the Online Safety Bill

In recent years, encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal have gained massive popularity around the world. The main reason behind this is the fact that these apps offer a high level of security and privacy to their users, thanks to end-to-end encryption. However, the UK government's proposed Online Safety Bill has raised concerns among these companies, leading them to join forces to oppose the bill.

The Online Safety Bill is a piece of legislation aimed at regulating the online space in the UK. The bill is meant to protect people from harmful content online such as terrorist propaganda, hate speech, and child abuse. The bill would require social media companies and messaging services to take responsibility for the content shared on their platforms, with penalties for failing to do so.

While this might seem like a positive development on the surface, encrypted messaging companies fear that the bill would undermine the very security and privacy that makes their apps so popular. End-to-end encryption means that only the sender and receiver of a message can read it, making it impossible for anyone else, including the messaging service itself, to access the content. This is a crucial feature for people who value their privacy and security, such as journalists, activists, and whistleblowers.

The UK government, however, argues that the Online Safety Bill would not compromise encryption. According to the government, the bill only targets companies that provide messaging services to children under the age of 18, and even then, it only requires them to take "proportionate" measures to protect children from harmful content. The government also says that the bill will not give law enforcement agencies any new powers to access encrypted messages.

But encrypted messaging companies remain skeptical. In an open letter addressed to UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, WhatsApp, Signal, and other companies argue that the bill would create a "backdoor" into their apps, allowing governments to access people's private conversations without their knowledge or consent. This, in turn, would make it easier for authoritarian regimes to spy on their citizens and violate their human rights.

The letter also points out that the bill would be difficult to implement in practice, as it would require companies to monitor and moderate every message sent on their platform. This would be an almost impossible task, given the sheer volume of messages sent every day. Moreover, it would also create a "chilling effect" on free speech, as people would be less likely to express themselves freely if they know their messages are being monitored.

The issue of encryption has been a contentious one for governments around the world. While encryption is crucial for protecting people's privacy and security, it also makes it harder for law enforcement agencies to investigate crimes and apprehend criminals. Some governments have called for "backdoors" into encryption to give them access to encrypted messages, but this has been met with resistance from tech companies and privacy advocates.

In the case of the Online Safety Bill, encrypted messaging companies are not alone in their opposition. Human rights groups, free speech advocates, and tech industry bodies have also raised concerns about the bill's potential impact on privacy and free expression. The bill has yet to be passed into law, and it remains to be seen how the UK government will address these concerns.

In conclusion, the UK's proposed Online Safety Bill has raised concerns among encrypted messaging companies like WhatsApp and Signal. These companies fear that the bill would compromise the security and privacy of their apps, and make it easier for governments to spy on their citizens. While the UK government insists that the bill would not undermine encryption, companies and privacy advocates remain skeptical. The issue of encryption is a complex one, and any attempts to regulate it must balance the need for security with the need for privacy and free expression.


bottom of page